ABSTRACT
Background and aims: The spectrum of Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) has been clinically defined from asymptomatic carriers to critical illness. Different inflammatory markers have been used to account for the severity and outcomes of this disease in different settings. Our study aims to investigate the role of these inflammatory markers in defining COVID-19 severity. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 200 confirmed cases of COVID-19. Inflammatory markers including lymphocyte count, D-Dimers, Ferritin, CRP, LDH were noted at admission. The moderate-to-critical disease was defined according to the WHO criteria. Descriptive statistics were applied. Mann-Whitney U-test was applied to compare the difference of markers between moderate-severe and critical patients. ROC was plotted to determine the cut-off values of these markers. Binary logistics regression analysis was used to assess which markers significantly predict the severity of COVID-19. Results: A D-dimer value of >775 ng/ml and LDH >495 U/L had a sensitivity of 72.9% and 79.2% and specificity of 57.9% and 53.6% respectively for critical COVID-19 illness. CRP levels of >100.5 mg/dl has a sensitivity of 66.7%. All inflammatory markers were significantly higher in a critical group of patients (p < 0.05) except for lymphopenia. Binary logistics regression analysis shows that LDH levels and D-dimers were only significant predictors of severity in COVID-19 patients. Conclusion: Inflammatory markers at admission are very useful in defining the severity of COVID-19 in addition to the clinical criteria. This is also useful in predicting adverse outcomes.
ABSTRACT
Background: COVID-19 is having many impacts on health, economy and social life; some due to the indirect effects of closure of health facilities to curb the spread. Closures were implemented in Pakistan from March 2020, affecting provision of reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health (RMNCH) services. Aims: To appraise the effects of containment and lockdown policies on RMNCH service utilization in order to develop an early response to avoid the catastrophic impact of COVID-19 on RMNCH in Pakistan. Methods: Routine monitoring data were analysed for indicators utilization of RMNCH care. The analysis was based on Period 1 (January-May 2020, first wave of COVID-19); Period 2 (June-September 2020, declining number of cases of COVID-19); and Period 3 (October-December 2020, second wave of COVID-19). We also compared data from May and December 2020 with corresponding months in 2019, to ascertain whether changes were due to COVID-19. Results: Reduced utilization was noted for all RMNCH indicators during Periods 1 and 3. There was a greater decline in service utilization during the first wave, and the highest reduction (~82%) was among children aged < 5 years, who were treated for pneumonia. The number of caesarean sections dropped by 57%, followed by institutional deliveries and first postnatal visit (37% each). Service utilization increased from June to September, but the second wave of COVID-19 led to another decrease. Conclusion: To reinstate routine services, priority actions and key areas include continued provision of family planning services along with uninterrupted immunization campaigns and routine maternal and child services.